Picture
Photo courtesy of Jamie Kingham
The winter edition of "edible Reno-Tahoe" just hit newsstands and pasted below is the beginning of an article I wrote about some fascinating farmers along the East Side of the Sierra...a portion of the story had to be cut from the print version in order to make word count so I've included it here. The omitted section shares how the farmers, Dan and Rachel McClure, met and got started farming. Knowing the background and history of a farmer is just as important as knowing what they grow and how. Because really...how can you know your farmer if you don't know their "story"? And often, it is the best part as you will find out below. For the complete story, go to the edible Reno Tahoe" website.

As we walked through the greenhouse, clipping and sampling leaves and flowers, it felt a little like a scene out of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, where everything seemed edible. It was magical as licorice exploded from the French Tarragon and the taste of cucumber from the Starflower made my eyes widen in surprise. 

I wasn’t on a movie set; rather, this was the small, specialty-crop farm of Dan and Rachel McClure with Sierra Edibles and Nevada’s Own. On 10 acres of land below the beautiful Sierra Nevada mountains in Wellington, Nevada, the McClures produce more than just edible flowers but also a variety of herbs, hardy perennials, native berries, heirloom tomatoes, free-range eggs, and one unique variety of mushrooms.

Dan and Rachel first met in Palm Desert, California in 1996 and moved to San Luis Obispo a year later to attend Cal Poly. There, they sealed their fate together...Upon graduation in 2000, they stood on life’s frontier. With youthful enthusiasm, they wrote their mutual goal together and displayed it on a sign in their backyard greenhouse. The sign read: “In five years, we will be growing food for market.”

Dan’s love for plants and flowers, however, began long before, when visiting a sick relative who was on an extended stay in the hospital.

“I noticed that people only smiled two times when in the hospital … when they heard a baby was born and when they received flowers,” Dan recalled. “I knew then, I wanted to be in the garden business and make people happy.”

Dan’s horticulture science degree took them to Oklahoma after graduation where he pursued a career in commercial greenhouse production. But a conversation that began at Cal Poly itched at them through their early profession...A college lecture discussed the threshold of pesticide use in the field. Dan and Rachel struggled with this industry practice, knowing it was not how they planned to fulfill their goal. And when they had their first son, Roark, with brother Atlas following six years later, they knew the game had changed; they wanted to pursue a type of farming that was good both for their family and the earth. By 2005, it was time to move and start their own more ecologically sound practice.

Dan had grown up in the Sierra, so it was a natural choice to return home and settle in a place that was both scenic and in close proximity to several consumer markets where the McClures could sell their food. As they unpacked, they discovered the sign they had made five years earlier in San Luis Obispo...something to be said for the power of intention.

Read the rest of the story at edible Reno-Tahoe magazine!


 
Picture
The more I read and observe, the more I struggle with the variance in organic farming practices. The organic label allows pest & weed applications derived from "natural sources" like roots and flowers. Some are crafty, homemade concoctions made from garlic, cayenne and eggs to ward off aphids. Sounds honest enough. But many of the over-the-counter products push the boundary with labels that read, "can be used in organic gardening." They all must be OMRI certified but a product could be borderline or not even permitted in all states. My question is...is it realistic to think that organic farming can rely on natural farming techniques alone to manage pest and weed concerns? Or is some external intervention okay? I'm going to peel back the onion and give my best assessment...

When people define organic farming, it should include, "grown without the use of synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides." What this usually evokes is a field of sunshine happy vegetables that never receive anything but water and compost. Within organic, no synthetic chemicals are used but there is a broad spectrum of accepted amendment practices. On the left, you have those who believe that the natural interactions between living and non-living organisms in a biodiverse ecosystem will keep the peace. On the right, you have growers who take an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach monitoring the different life cycles in the growing environment and use "organic approved" remedies to keep the weed and pest population in check. In the middle, are those who lean to the left but are pulled to the right on occasion.

My philosophy is...farm management style will determine where on the spectrum a grower falls. I've identified three key areas of farm management...biodiversity, soil health and organization. Yes, organization! In my opinion, to be a successful farmer, you must run a tight ship with a planting schedule, record keeping, discipline and protocols. Being organized builds resiliency in a farming practice because it helps a farmer take a whole systems approach to managing their farm, systems that are less reactionary to economic and climate fluctuations, i.e. one crops fails but the farmer has back-up crops, anticipating a wet spring can help a farmer adjust their planting schedule. But most importantly, an organized farmer will "know" their farm keeping a watchful eye for intruders and outbreaks. Observation can be the best line of defense.

Biodiversity measures the variety of different life forms around the farm from bugs and bees to livestock and wildlife as well as woodlands. Imagine an ecosystem. A farm should mimic those principles. Biodiversity, however, can also include crop diversity. Monocultures (growing one crop in a field) are risky because the crop is more vulnerable to attack. One pest and the whole crop goes down. And monocultures give and take the same nutrients from the soil year after year creating an imbalance and depleting soil of essential minerals. With polycultures, you grow a variety of different fruits and vegetables...a few rows of this, a few rows of that, etc. From year to year, different plants enrich the soil with nutrients that will benefit next year's crops. But even within the same year, crop's inter-planted together (intercropping), or in immediate succession, can have a positive exchange. Above ground,  hedgerows or "trap crops" can attract pests away from market crops. It can sound a little like whose on second but here's an example..on the edge of a squash crop, sunflowers are planted to attract insects. The secondary benefit is birds will then eat the insects off the sunflower. Below ground, the chemical make-up of one crop can help mitigate soil-born disease for another crop or reduce the proliferation of certain weeds.

Plants aren't totally helpless though. They have natural defenses to ward off pest and disease. But these natural defenses are only as strong as the soil. The soil is like a plant's immune system. Just like humans, when our immune system is low, we get sick. As a rule, soil that is properly amended with compost, receives a cover crop in the winter and different crops each growing season will produce healthy plants.

When we look at the different applications, many sound pretty safe. Take Surround for instance. it is made from a type of clay, kaolin. When sprayed on a plant it leaves a non-toxic, milky barrier that bugs don't like or have a hard time eating through. It's approved but should it be applied as a prophylactic or only when necessary? It's easy to give these "organic approved" substances too many liberties. Just because a product is deemed "safe" doesn't mean it can't have adverse effects. Routine and in discriminate applications can enable bugs to develop resistance. Insecticidal soaps seem pretty benign. They can be used to to kill bugs when hand-picking or spraying water doesn't work. It can be bought or made at home with a simple recipe. It's safe for the garden and isn't harmful to most beneficial insects but does that give it free reign. Sean Swezey, a professor at UC Santa Cruz, said it best, "Don't think conventionally when problem solving in organic farming."

Another product is corn gluten, which stops the germination of weed seeds. All reports look good and it is ecologically safe but is the corn GMO? And can the additional nitrogen in the corn gluten overload the soil (doing an annual soil test is important before using additives)?  One product I've been researching is Sluggo Plus. The active ingredient is Iron Phosphate which is naturally occurring in soil so when dissolved, it acts as a nice soil amendment. But it also includes spinosad which attacks an insects nervous system forcing them to stop feeding and die. While non-toxic to most beneficial insects, except honeybees, who are we to say what is beneficial or not. We humans know a lot about insects, organism and bacteria but we don't know everything.

Even if "organically approved," insecticides can be broad-spectrum killing non-target bugs which disrupts the garden's biodiversity and its ability to self-regulate naturally. Kill one bug and next there is an explosion of another pest which use to get eaten by the bug that was just killed. It begins a vicious cycle of pest control measures. Other alternatives include introducing parasites to attack the target pest. While natural, mishandling of his method can backfire. But studies show that when done correctly the ecosystem is more likely to self-regulate the populations than with an insecticide.

I don't claim to be an authority. Just a regular Josephine trying to make sense of it all. But I do believe...a rigorous and thoughtful schedule of cover crops, crop rotation, intercropping and compost will enable a farm of, any size, to take care of itself with minimal to no foreign inputs. Run an organized, biodiverse farm and the soil will deliver.

 
Picture
We visited the Downown Farmer's Market this afternoon in Santa Cruz and were greeted by some of summer''s best...peaches, strawberries, figs, plums, beets, garlic and herbs. One of the farms was called Dirty Girl Produce. I liked the name so much, I took a picture just because.

It's day three and I feel like I'm reaching the maximum speed on the information treadmill. My mind is running with as all kinds ideas sparking from all that we are learning. As I sit and absorb, I feel so fortunate to be receiving this level of instruction without having to enroll in a semester long course. Immersion is where it's at!

Today's classroom lesson was devoted in large part to biodiversity and the interactions between species. Organic farms don't use chemical pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. Instead, they rely on natural systems to manage and nurture the balance like planting different crops together which push & pull pests and nutrients from each other. Not only have studies proven that you'll have higher yields than conventional farms per acre but you'll be putting back into the environment versus taking away. If you want to learn more about the benefits of biodiversity for both plant health and pest management, check out this article by Miguel Altieri (we were honored to have Miguel as one of our guest speakers today).

But my soapbox for the day is...we need to shift the sustainable food revolution away from being an environmental movement and towards a social movement. As a social movement, we'll be able to garner more support because more people can relate to social issues, i.e. health, jobs, justice, etc... Access and availability to quality, healthy food is as much as social movement as it is an environmental one. Through the process they will understand the environmental benefits. At the same time, we need to take lessons from developing countries like those in South America who can mobilize 2 million or more people within 24hrs. for a social demonstration or protest (Miguel shared this fun fact with me too). They use buzz marketing tactics where a core group of organizers call a sub-group of connected people who sound the alarm to area communities where word spreads like wildfire. I'm sure they use Twitter and Facebook but those forms of social media are easy to ignore. When it's direct, you feel the urgency and make the connection between the issue and your own welfare much faster. If we had rallies of this magnitude in the US, we would get some stuff done in this country.